The primary reason why people argue against the reinstation of the death penalty is because of the execution of innocent people which in turn, leads to serious miscarriages of justice. This is the primary argument as to why Capital Punishment should not be reinstated because, there have been unlawful executions of innocent civilians who were in the wrong place at the wrong time Against Death Penalty Essay. words 2 page(s) The historical record suggests that the death penalty sentence has been carried out since at least 16th century B.C. The first record of death penalty sentence in the U.S. is of George Kendall of Virginia who was sentenced to death in for betraying the British. The death penalty remains a 4 rows · Mar 21, · Against the Death Penalty Essay. 21 Mar, Free Samples 0. The Death Penalty is
Persuasive Essay Against The Death Penalty - MyHomeworkWriters
This sample is NOT ORIGINAL. He also pointed out that a record number of 56 murderers were executed in alone, and many of the people in America and the Supreme Court believe that executions are appropriate punishment for certain criminals committing specific crimes Sharp. Capital punishment is a controversial topic all over the world because of the immense value associated with human life. No science or technology has so far succeeded in creating an artificial life form in a laboratory setup.
We have already succeeded in gathering useful information about even the distant planets in and out of the solar system; but still our knowledge about the origin of life, architecture of the life, life before birth and life after death etc are very limited.
Proponents of capital punishment argue that instead of giving capital punishment, keeping the hardcore criminals in prison for a lifelong period is highly expensive and meaningless, death penalty essays against. In my opinion, considering the value and mysteries surrounding human life, capital punishment is unethical or immoral.
Criminal justice systems in most of the countries believe that even if thousands of criminals escaped, no innocent people should be punished under any circumstances. We have lot of examples in which innocent people forced to accept punishments because of the circumstantial evidences collected against them by the law enforcement agencies. We should remember the story of one of the greatest philosophers of all time, Socrates, who forced to accept capital punishment since he tried to teach the word, the truth.
In other words, the existing criminal justice laws are not perfect and the loopholes may take the life of even innocent people. Life is the most precious thing in this world and once it is finished, no science or technology can regain it.
In short, considering the possibility of human error in judgements, capital punishment should be avoided under all circumstances. Judiciary always declare a person as innocent or criminal based on evidences collected by the law enforcement agencies. But it is quite possible that the law enforcement agency may fabricate evidences against the culprit in their thirst to prove their credentials and achieve fame. Many people believe that most of the evidences collected against the former Iraqi president Saddam Husain were fabricated ones and the criminal judicial system executed him because of the immense pressure exerted by America.
Extensive and comprehensive trails are required before giving capital punishment to a person. These trial processes are lengthy, time consuming and expensive compared to other cases. Evidences from eye witnesses, forensic testing, death penalty essays against, and the services of expert advocates etc are necessary before the court taking their ultimate decisions against the criminal. In short, the expenses required to give a person capital punishment is more than the expenses needed to keep him in jail for his life term, death penalty essays against.
In a civilized society like ours capital punishment is a barbarian act. Only the creator has the right to take or modify life of his creations. Since we are unable to create a life, we have no moral right to take a life. This world is not belonging to us. Even the strongest, powerful, influential or the wealthy person will leave this world one day, taking nothing in his hand. In other what we death penalty essays against in this world are only some illusions. We are only the temporary custodians of our properties.
The properties in this world belong to the creator and only he has the authority to do whatever he wants with his property. Human life belongs to the property of the creator and we have no authority over it.
Capital punishment means taking the life of a person before the time of his natural death. Even though science has answer to the question about the life before birth and after death, religions have. Laws of science believe that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed. At the same time it can be transformed from one form to another.
It is logical to believe that our soul or spirit is the energy form which drives our body and mind. Without soul, death penalty essays against, spirit or life, death penalty essays against, body is dysfunctional or dead.
If that is true, it is impossible for us to destroy the soul since it is an energy form, even if we would be able to destroy the body. In other words, as long as science is unable to unveil the mysteries surrounding life and death, it is better to accept the religious beliefs and principles about life and death. No religion advocates the capital punishment under any circumstances and hence it should be avoided. The creator has certain plans about our lives in this word and it is ethical to allow the creator to execute his plans.
Most of the criminals forced to commit crimes only because of the momentary death penalty essays against in controlling their emotions. It is unethical to take their lives for such a momentary emotional outburst. As we have not many ideas about the life before birth or after death, it is unwise to take the life of a person in the name of capital punishment. Life is so precious and science has no clue at all about the life architecture, death penalty essays against.
There is no point in taking the life of a person for saving life of others when options are available save the life of death penalty essays against. University of Alaska Anchorage, Justice Centre.
Sharp D. Against Death penalty. March 13, Accessed 19 May, Essay Samples Death Penalty Essays Against Death penalty. Death Penalty. Struggling with your HW? Get your assignments done by real pros.
Save your precious time and boost your marks with ease. Just fill in your HW requirements and you can count on us! Order your HW now. Used our essay samples for inspiration? For more help, death penalty essays against into our pool of professional writers and get expert essay editing services! Edit my Essay. Life is Precious. Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life. The Death Penalty — An American History. Is Death Penalty Effective?
Find Free Essays. We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling. Popular Topics. A Rose for Emily American Dream Animal Rights Argumentative Civil War Cold War Compare and Contrast Cyberbullying Death Penalty Educational Goals Family George Washington Great Depression Great Gatsby Gun Control Homelessness Imperialism Macbeth Management Death penalty essays against Legislation Martin Luther King Minimum Wage Nature vs Nurture Overpopulation Persuasive Police Brutality Romeo and Juliet Rose Parks School Uniform Slavery Stress Teenage Pregnancy The Story of an Hour Water Pollution Death penalty essays against Am I.
Copy to Clipboard.
The Death Penalty Debate
, time: 8:06Against the Death Penalty Essay | Examples & Papers
This is a company you can trust to deliver the best persuasive essay against the death penalty. Rest assured that you will receive a high-quality, % original paper written by the best in the business. Conclusion. Ultimately, your persuasive essay against the death penalty is an argument against sentencing criminals to death. Your paper Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins This essay has sought to examine the various demerits and concerns raised against the application of death as a form of punishment for murder. The high cost of capital punishment is worth the debate as to whether we should abolish the death penalty and introduce other alternatives to this technique of dealing with serious crime (Costanzo and White).Estimated Reading Time: 7 mins Against The Death Penalty Essay. Words4 Pages. Against the Death Penalty “Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder
No comments:
Post a Comment